Information from Deduction: Models and Proofs

نویسندگان

  • Nikolaj S. Bjørner
  • Jasmin Christian Blanchette
  • Viorica Sofronie-Stokkermans
  • Christoph Weidenbach
  • Carsten Fuhs
چکیده

This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 15381 “Information from Deduction: Models and Proofs”. The aim of the seminar was to bring together researchers working in deduction and applications that rely on models and proofs produced by deduction tools. Proofs and models serve two main purposes: (1) as an upcoming paradigm towards the next generation of automated deduction tools where search relies on (partial) proofs and models; (2) as the actual result of an automated deduction tool, which is increasingly integrated into application tools. Applications are rarely well served by a simple yes/no answer from a deduction tool. Many use models as certificates for satisfiability to extract feasible program executions; others use proof objects as certificates for unsatisfiability in the context of highintegrity systems development. Models and proofs even play an integral role within deductive tools as major methods for efficient proof search rely on refining a simultaneous search for a model or a proof. The topic is in a sense evergreen: models and proofs will always be an integral part of deduction. Nonetheless, the seminar was especially timely given recent activities in deduction and applications, and it enabled researchers from different subcommunities to communicate with each other towards exploiting synergies. Seminar September 13–18, 2015 – http://www.dagstuhl.de/15381 1998 ACM Subject Classification D.2.4 Software/Program Verification, F.2.2 Nonnumerical Algorithms and Problems, F.3.1 Specifying and Verifying and Reasoning about Programs, F.4.1 Mathematical Logic, F.4.2 Grammars and Other Rewriting Systems, G.1.6 Optimization, I.2.3 Deduction and Theorem Proving

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Determining Semantic Textual Similarity using Natural Deduction Proofs

Determining semantic textual similarity is a core research subject in natural language processing. Since vector-based models for sentence representation often use shallow information, capturing accurate semantics is difficult. By contrast, logical semantic representations capture deeper levels of sentence semantics, but their symbolic nature does not offer graded notions of textual similarity. ...

متن کامل

A Theory of Nonmonotonic Rule Systems

In mathematics, a consequence drawn by a deduction from a set of premises can also drawn by the same deduction from any larger set of premises. The deduction remains a deduction no matter how the axioms are increased. This is monotonic reasoning, much imitated in other, less certain, disciplines. The very nature of monotonic reasoning makes mathematical proofs permanent, independent of new info...

متن کامل

The geometry of non-distributive logics

In this paper we introduce a new natural deduction system for the logic of lattices, and a number of extensions of lattice logic with different negation connectives. We provide the class of natural deduction proofs with both a standard inductive definition and a global graph-theoretical criterion for correctness, and we show how normalisation in this system corresponds to cut elimination in the...

متن کامل

Transforming and Analyzing Proofs in the CERES-System

Cut-elimination is the most prominent form of proof transformation in logic. The elimination of cuts in formal proofs corresponds to the removal of intermediate statements (lemmas) in mathematical proofs. Cut-elimination can be applied to mine real mathematical proofs, i.e. for extracting explicit and algorithmic information. The system CERES (cut-elimination by resolution) is based on automate...

متن کامل

Computational Aspects of Proofs in Modal Logic

Various modal logics seem well suited for developing models of knowledge, belief, time, change, causality, and other intensional concepts. Most such systems are related to the classical Lewis systems, and thereby have a substantial body of conventional proof theoretical results. However, most of the applied literature examines modal logics from a semantical point of view, rather than through pr...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016